View and manage resources deployed by GitLab agent For Kubernetes
Status | Authors | Coach | DRIs | Owning Stage | Created |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
implemented |
shinya.maeda
|
DylanGriffith
|
nagyv-gitlab
cbalane
hustewart
hfyngvason
|
devops deploy | 2022-11-23 |
Summary
As part of the GitLab Kubernetes Dashboard epic, users want to view and manage their resources deployed by GitLab agent For Kubernetes. Users should be able to interact with the resources through GitLab UI, such as Environment Index/Details page.
This blueprint describes how the association is established and how these domain models interact with each other.
Motivation
Goals
- The proposed architecture can be used in GitLab Kubernetes Dashboard.
- The proposed architecture can be used in Organization-level Environment dashboard.
- The cluster resources and events can be visualized per GitLab Environment. An environment-specific view scoped to the resources managed either directly or indirectly by a deployment commit.
- Support both GitOps mode and CI Access mode.
Non-Goals
- The design details of GitLab Kubernetes Dashboard and Organization-level Environment dashboard.
- Support Environment/Deployment features that rely on GitLab CI/CD pipelines, such as Protected Environments, Deployment Approvals, Deployment safety, and Environment rollback. These features are already available in CI Access mode, however, it’s not available in GitOps mode.
Proposal
Overview
- GitLab Environment and GitLab agent For Kubernetes have 1-to-1 relationship.
- GitLab Environment tracks all resources produced by the connected agent. This includes not only resources written in manifest files but also subsequently generated resources (for example,
Pod
s created byDeployment
manifest file). - GitLab Environment renders dependency graph, such as
Deployment
=>ReplicaSet
=>Pod
. This is for providing ArgoCD-style resource view. - GitLab Environment has the Resource Health status that represents a summary of resource statuses, such as
Healthy
,Progressing
orDegraded
.
flowchart LR subgraph Kubernetes["Kubernetes"] subgraph ResourceGroupProduction["Production"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionPod2(["Pod2"]) end subgraph ResourceGroupStaging["Staging"] direction LR ResourceGroupStagingService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupStagingDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupStagingPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupStagingPod2(["Pod2"]) end end subgraph GitLab subgraph Organization subgraph Project environment1["production environment"] environment2["staging environment"] end end end environment1 --- ResourceGroupProduction environment2 --- ResourceGroupStaging ResourceGroupProductionService -.- ResourceGroupProductionDeployment ResourceGroupProductionDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionPod1 ResourceGroupProductionDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionPod2 ResourceGroupStagingService -.- ResourceGroupStagingDeployment ResourceGroupStagingDeployment -.- ResourceGroupStagingPod1 ResourceGroupStagingDeployment -.- ResourceGroupStagingPod2
Existing components and relationships
- GitLab Project and GitLab Environment have 1-to-many relationship.
- GitLab Project and Agent have 1-to-many direct relationship. Only one project can own a specific agent.
- GitOps mode
- GitLab Project and Agent do NOT have many-to-many indirect relationship yet. This will be supported in Manifest projects outside of the Agent configuration project.
- CI Access mode
- GitLab Project and Agent have many-to-many indirect relationship. The project owning the agent can share the access with the other proejcts. (NOTE: Technically, only running jobs inside the project are allowed to access the cluster due to job-token authentication.)
Issues
- GitLab Environment should have ID of GitLab agent For Kubernetes as the foreign key.
- GitLab Environment should have parameters how to group resources in the associated cluster, for example,
namespace
,lable
andinventory-id
(GitOps mode only) can passed as parameters. - GitLab Environment should be able to fetch all relevant resources, including both default resource kinds and other Custom Resources.
- GitLab Environment should be aware of dependency graph.
- GitLab Environment should be able to compute Resource Health status from the associated resources.
Example
This is an example of how the architecture works in push-based deployment. The feature is documented here as CI access mode.
flowchart LR subgraph ProductionKubernetes["Production Kubernetes"] subgraph ResourceGroupProductionFrontend["Production"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionFrontendService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod2(["Pod2"]) end subgraph ResourceGroupProductionBackend["Staging"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionBackendService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod2(["Pod2"]) end subgraph ResourceGroupProductionPrometheus["Monitoring"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod2(["Pod2"]) end end subgraph GitLab subgraph Organization subgraph OperationGroup subgraph AgentManagementProject AgentManagementAgentProduction["Production agent"] AgentManagementManifestFiles["Kubernetes Manifest Files"] AgentManagementEnvironmentProductionPrometheus["production prometheus environment"] AgentManagementPipelines["CI/CD pipelines"] end end subgraph DevelopmentGroup subgraph FrontendAppProject FrontendAppCode["VueJS"] FrontendDockerfile["Dockerfile"] end subgraph BackendAppProject BackendAppCode["Golang"] BackendDockerfile["Dockerfile"] end subgraph DeploymentProject DeploymentManifestFiles["Kubernetes Manifest Files"] DeploymentPipelines["CI/CD pipelines"] DeploymentEnvironmentProductionFrontend["production frontend environment"] DeploymentEnvironmentProductionBackend["production backend environment"] end end end end DeploymentEnvironmentProductionFrontend --- ResourceGroupProductionFrontend DeploymentEnvironmentProductionBackend --- ResourceGroupProductionBackend AgentManagementEnvironmentProductionPrometheus --- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheus ResourceGroupProductionFrontendService -.- ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod1 ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod2 ResourceGroupProductionBackendService -.- ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod1 ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod2 ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusService -.- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod1 ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod2 AgentManagementAgentProduction -- Shared with --- DeploymentProject DeploymentPipelines -- "Deploy" --> ResourceGroupProductionFrontend DeploymentPipelines -- "Deploy" --> ResourceGroupProductionBackend AgentManagementPipelines -- "Deploy" --> ResourceGroupProductionPrometheus
Further details
Multi-Project Deployment Pipelines
The microservice project setup can be improved by Multi-Project Deployment Pipelines:
- Deployment Project can behave as the shared deployment engine for any upstream application projects and environments.
- Environments can be created within the application projects. It gives more visibility of environments for developers.
- Deployment Project can be managed under Operator group. More segregation of duties.
- Users don’t need to set up RBAC to restrict CI/CD jobs.
- This is especially helpful for dynamic environments like review apps.
flowchart LR subgraph ProductionKubernetes["Production Kubernetes"] subgraph ResourceGroupProductionFrontend["Frontend"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionFrontendService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod2(["Pod2"]) end subgraph ResourceGroupProductionBackend["Backend"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionBackendService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod2(["Pod2"]) end subgraph ResourceGroupProductionPrometheus["Monitoring"] direction LR ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusService(["Service"]) ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment(["Deployment"]) ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod1(["Pod1"]) ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod2(["Pod2"]) end end subgraph GitLab subgraph Organization subgraph OperationGroup subgraph DeploymentProject DeploymentAgentProduction["Production agent"] DeploymentManifestFiles["Kubernetes Manifest Files"] DeploymentEnvironmentProductionPrometheus["production prometheus environment"] DeploymentPipelines["CI/CD pipelines"] end end subgraph DevelopmentGroup subgraph FrontendAppProject FrontendDeploymentPipelines["CI/CD pipelines"] FrontendEnvironmentProduction["production environment"] end subgraph BackendAppProject BackendDeploymentPipelines["CI/CD pipelines"] BackendEnvironmentProduction["production environment"] end end end end FrontendEnvironmentProduction --- ResourceGroupProductionFrontend BackendEnvironmentProduction --- ResourceGroupProductionBackend DeploymentEnvironmentProductionPrometheus --- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheus ResourceGroupProductionFrontendService -.- ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod1 ResourceGroupProductionFrontendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionFrontendPod2 ResourceGroupProductionBackendService -.- ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod1 ResourceGroupProductionBackendDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionBackendPod2 ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusService -.- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod1 ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusDeployment -.- ResourceGroupProductionPrometheusPod2 FrontendDeploymentPipelines -- "Trigger downstream pipeline" --> DeploymentProject BackendDeploymentPipelines -- "Trigger downstream pipeline" --> DeploymentProject DeploymentPipelines -- "Deploy" --> ResourceGroupProductionFrontend DeploymentPipelines -- "Deploy" --> ResourceGroupProductionBackend
Design and implementation details
Associate Environment with Agent
Users can explicitly set a GitLab agent For Kubernetes to a GitLab Environment in setting UI. Frontend will use this associated agent for authenticating/authorizing the user access, which is described in a latter section.
We need to adjust the read_cluster_agent
permission in DeclarivePolicy for supporting agents shared by an external project (also known as the Agent management project).
Fetch resources through user_access
When user visits an environment page, GitLab frontend fetches an environment via GraphQL. Frontend additionally fetches the associated agent-ID and namespace.
Here is an example of GraphQL query:
{
project(fullPath: "group/project") {
id
environment(name: "<environment-name>") {
slug
kubernetesNamespace
clusterAgent {
id
name
project {
name
}
}
}
}
}
GitLab frontend authenticate/authorize the user access with browser cookie. If the access is forbidden, frontend shows an error message that You don't have access to an agent that deployed to this environment. Please contact agent administrator if you are allowed in "user_access" in agent config file. See <troubleshooting-doc-link>
.
After the user gained access to the agent, GitLab frontend fetches specific Resource kinds (for example, Deployment
, Pod
) in the Kubernetes with the following parameters:
namespace
…#{environment.kubernetesNamespace}
If no resources are found, this is likely that the users have not embedded these lables into their resources. In this case, frontend shows an warning message There are no resources found for the environment. Do resources have GitLab preserved labels? See <troubleshooting-doc-link>
.
Dependency graph
- GitLab frontend uses Owner References to idenfity the dependencies between resources. These are embedded in resources as
metadata.ownerReferences
field. - For the resoruces that don’t have owner references, we can use Well-Known Labels, Annotations and Taints as complement. for example,
EndpointSlice
doesn’t havemetadata.ownerReferences
, but haskubernetes.io/service-name
as a reference to the parentService
resource.
Health status of resources
- GitLab frontend computes the status summary from the fetched resources. Something similar to ArgoCD’s Resource Health for example,
Healthy
,Progressing
,Degraded
andSuspended
. The formula is TBD.
e47101dc
)