Work Items

This document is a work-in-progress. Some aspects are not documented, though we expect to add them in the future.

Summary

Work Items is a new architecture created to support the various types of built and planned entities throughout the product, such as issues, requirements, and incidents. It will make these types easy to extend and customize while sharing the same core functionality.

Terminology

We use the following terms to describe components and properties of the Work items architecture.

Work Item

Base type for issue, requirement, test case, incident and task (this list is planned to extend in the future). Different work items have the same set of base properties but their widgets list is different.

Work Item types

A set of predefined types for different categories of work items. These are defined within the work_item_types table in the database.

Work item types in the GitLab product

While the default work item types from above exist in the production database, they may not be used in the UI of the GitLab product since we are in the process of migrating each type from using legacy APIs to work items APIs. In cases where legacy items exist, we also need to migrate data to the issues table, where all work items are stored and build new widgets to encompass all functionality.

Work Item properties

Every Work Item type has the following common properties:

NOTE: You can also refer to fields of Work Item to learn more.

• id - a unique Work Item global identifier;
• iid - internal ID of the Work Item, relative to the parent workspace (currently workspace can only be a project)
• Work Item type;
• properties related to Work Item modification time: createdAt, updatedAt, closedAt;
• title string;
• Work Item confidentiality state;
• Work Item state (can be open or closed);
• lock version, incremented each time the work item is updated;
• permissions for the current user on the resource
• a list of Work Item widgets

Work Item widgets

All Work Item types share the same pool of predefined widgets and are customized by which widgets are active on a specific type. The list of widgets for any certain Work Item type is currently predefined and is not customizable. However, in the future we plan to allow users to create new Work Item types and define a set of widgets for them.

Widget types (updating)

Widget availability (updating)

Legend

• ✅ - Widget available
• ✔️ - Widget planned to be available
• ❌ - Widget not available
• ❓ - Widget pending for consideration
• 🔍 - Alternative widget planned

Work item relationships

Work items can be related to other work items in a number of different ways:

• Parent: A direct ancestor to the current work item, whose completion relies on completing this work item.
• Child: A direct descendant of the current work item, which contributes to this work item’s completion.
• Blocked by: A work item preventing the completion of the current work item.
• Blocks: A work item whose completion is blocked by the current work item.
• Related: A work item that is relevant to the subject of the current work item, but does not directly contribute to or block the completion of this work item.

Hierarchy

Parent-child relationships form the basis of hierarchy in work items. Each work item type has a defined set of types that can be parents or children of that type.

As types expand, and parent items have their own parent items, the hierarchy capability can grow exponentially.

Currently, following are the allowed Parent-child relationships:

Work Item view

The new frontend view that renders Work Items of any type using global Work Item id as an identifier.

Task

Task is a special Work Item type. Tasks can be added to issues as child items and can be displayed in the modal on the issue view.

Feature flags

Since this is a large project with numerous moving parts, feature flags are being used to track promotions of available widgets. The table below shows the different feature flags that are being used, and the audience that they are available to.

Contextual view feature flags

For epic work item specific feature flags, please see the Epic Work Item Migration Epic.

Motivation

Work Items main goal is to enhance the planning toolset to become the most popular collaboration tool for knowledge workers in any industry.

• Puts all like-items (issues, incidents, epics, test cases etc.) on a standard platform to simplify maintenance and increase consistency in experience
• Enables first-class support of common planning concepts to lower complexity and allow users to plan without learning GitLab-specific nuances.

Goals

Scalability

Currently, different entities like issues, epics, merge requests etc share many similar features but these features are implemented separately for every entity type. This makes implementing new features or refactoring existing ones problematic: for example, if we plan to add new feature to issues and incidents, we would need to implement it separately on issue and incident types. With work items, any new feature is implemented via widgets for all existing types which makes the architecture more scalable.

Flexibility

With existing implementation, we have a rigid structure for issuables, merge requests, epics etc. This structure is defined on both backend and frontend, so any change requires a coordinated effort. Also, it would be very hard to make this structure customizable for the user without introducing a set of flags to enable/disable any existing feature. Work Item architecture allows frontend to display Work Item widgets in a flexible way: whatever is present in Work Item widgets, will be rendered on the page. This allows us to make changes fast and makes the structure way more flexible. For example, if we want to stop displaying labels on the Incident page, we remove labels widget from Incident Work Item type on the backend. Also, in the future this will allow users to define the set of widgets they want to see on custom Work Item types.

A consistent experience

As much as we try to have consistent behavior for similar features on different entities, we still have differences in the implementation. For example, updating labels on merge request via GraphQL API can be done with dedicated setMergeRequestLabels mutation, while for the issue we call more coarse-grained updateIssue. This provides inconsistent experience for both frontend and external API users. As a result, epics, issues, requirements, and others all have similar but just subtle enough differences in common interactions that the user needs to hold a complicated mental model of how they each behave.

Work Item architecture is designed with making all the features for all the types consistent, implemented as Work Item widgets.

High-level architecture problems to solve

• how can we bypass groups and projects consolidation to migrate epics to Work Item type;
• dealing with parent-child relationships for certain Work Item types: epic > issue > task, and to the same Work Item types: issue > issue.
• implementing custom Work Item types and custom widgets

Links

• Work items initiative epic
• Tasks roadmap
• Work Item “Vision” Prototype
• Work Item Discussions

View page source - Edit this page - please contribute.